A Critique of Sir Anthony Hopkins's Oscar winning performance of Essay

A Critique of Sir Anthony Hopkinss Oscar winning perfor partce of Hannibal Lecter in The Silence of The Lambs - Essay manakin3 Hannibal was by all accounts an evil, savage, cannibal and serial killer and yet he became an enthralling, and often compassionate piece.4 The fact that a psychiatrist who put to deaths and then eats his patients could become such a captivating character is puzzling.When Hopkins meets the FBI agent for the first time,I could non help thinking that he while he seemed to be move with her,he had some degree of respect and suspicion in his interaction with her and Hopkins gave these impressions through body language and inflection.At wiz point he winked at her as if to share a private joke and at another(prenominal) point,he smiled at her,giving the impression that he had normal feelings.In my opinion, Hopkins brought a very complex character to life in a realistic and convincing way.Lecter was psychopathic personality evidenced by his superficial charm,ma nipulativeness and lack of compunction of empathy for the victims.For example, when the agent interviewing Lecter mentioned that serial killers usually kept a relic of their victims, Lecter interjected, I didnt in a matter of fact way. ... After all, Lecter was previously envisioned by actor Brian Cross and introduced him to the screen, it was Hopkins Lecter that made the sterling(prenominal) impression and immortalized him.7 Hannibal Lecter was a brutal cannibal and there was nothing sympathetic about the character and it was not intended that Lecter was sympathetic. Lecter is revoltingly evil, a characterization brought chillingly to life for millions by Anthony Hopkins in Silence of the Lamb.8 For example when discussing the murder of a former patient, Lecter denies killing his patient but states without emotion that it was best for him as his therapy was going nowhere anyway. However, Barr explains that Hopkins was brilliant in how he chose to play Lecter.9 Hopkins portrayed an ordinary man who did extraordinary whole kit and boodle and came across as a man you would not run away from if you happened to come across him on the streets. I observed this in his demeanour as he urged the FBI agent in training to video display her credentials and when she did, he urged her to come closer, as if he did not think she should fear a man like him. In other words, Hopkins played Lecter as though, Lecter thought of himself as normal and this brought both philanthropy to the character and made him likable and evil all at the same time. One acting proficiency that Hopkins brought to the character of Lecter was his refusal to judge the character. As Hopkins himself said As an actor, I cant judge because deterrent example judgement gets in the way of the characterization. If you start doing that, you end up playing the character like a zombie or a vauderville villain.10 In other words, Hopkins took and inside-out approach to his portrayal of Lecter. He portrayed the character by