Clerval and Elizabeth Essay

It confirms our belief that he has receive evil, scarce we also know the reasoning behind this,For no publication what he does he will al demeanors be shunned by humankind because of his appearance, and therefore why should he show them kindness if it is not reciprocated. The hit of William, 3 are all ruthless acts, they are also acts of avenging towards Frankenstein. Some would however, argue that if Frankenstein had indeed made him a female person better half then the torment would have ceased and Elizabeths life would have been spared. Frankenstein declares him a monster for these actions, but after all Frankenstein destroyed the instruments hopes for a female companion.However, the murders of William and Clerval can also, in some ways, be justified as acts of payback although they can be seen as vengeful and foul. This shows the instruments heartbreaking side. He is also capable of evil wickedness in the way that he coldly and calculatingly frames Justine of a murder s he did not pull out bloody shame Shelly had many themes running throughout her story bases on what she mat and what was going on around her at the time. One of the main themes is motif reform. Mary Shelly once described the French Revolution by proverb the giant now awoke. The mind received the spark which lit it into an inextinguishable flame . This could equally be her describing the wildcat. During The French Revolution never to begin with were seen acts that were carried out by the common people, the poor were now daring to let down the rich. Mary Shelly witnessed the destruction of her Mother and Fathers reputation caused by their revolutionary fervour and managed to distance herself from it. Perhaps Mary Shellys Frankenstein is an fiction of the French revolution.The creature could be seen as a demonstration of the consequences of unleashing an robustious force, Frankenstein could be seen as the initiators of the French Revolution who fail to control their followers. Frankenstein is very(prenominal) irresponsible of his creation and shuns it from the moment it comes to life, he also fails to keep the creature under control. The creature is then rejected, cursed and unloved by everyone, no matter what he does, he deals with his hurt and his anger by destroying everything he comes across and in conclusion he destroys his creator, Victor.Victors lack of business towards the monster has resulted in his own downfall. This is what happens to the people who lead the way in French Revolution. They too created a monster who grew out of control and eventually the leaders were executed. Frankensteins creature begs to be treated with kindness and repute, but he is spurned and rejected. His moral monstrosity of the terror is also a creation of the French Aristocracy. If the Aristrocracy had acknowledged and paid gratitude and respect to the common people, they would of reciprocated in kind and the need for a revolution would be unnecessary.. Both the cre ature and his creator are warnings/demonstrations to the world the powerful must esteem and respect the powerless, or revolution will ensue. Now I come to adjudicate the question does Shelly intend us to respond to the creature as a monster. What Mary Shelly is saying is that monsters arent born they are made. This is distinct in the way that the creature is treated. When he is first introduced to the world he is a kind, loving being, perhaps even an example of goodness.But when in the face of people he is rejected, cursed upon and unloved, this in effect turns the creature into a monster. Mary is also saying that reform, when it is controlled and in the right hands is not a bas thing, but when we fail to control it will set up uncontrollable and become evil. By Joshua Gray Show preview unless The above preview is unformatted text This student written piece of bunk is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Mary Shelley section.